References

1.  Borcherding, T. E. (1977) Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, Duke University Press: Durham N.C.

2.  Caves, D. W. and Christensen, L. R. (1980) ‘The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Competitive Environment: The Case of Canadian Railroads’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88, p. 958.

3.  Davies, D. G. (1971) ‘The Efficiency of Public versus Private Firms: The Case of Australia's Two Airlines’, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 14, p. 149.

4.  Davies, D. G. (1977) ‘Property Rights and Economic Efficiency – The Australian Airlines Revisited’, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 20, p. 223.

5.  De Alessi, L. (1974) ‘An Economic Analysis of Government Ownership and Regulation Theory and the Evidence from the Electric Power Industry’ Public Choice, vol. 19, p. 1.

6.  D'Souza, J. and Megginson, W.L. (1999) ‘The Financial and Operating Performance of Privatized Firms during the 1990s’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 1397-1438.

7.  Forsyth, P. J. and Hocking, R. D. (1980) ‘Property Rights and Efficiency in a Regulated Environment: The Case of Australian Airlines’Economic Record, p. 182.

8.  HM Treasury (1990) The Government's Expenditure Plans 1990–91 to 1992–93, Cm. 1001, HMSO: London.

9.  HM Treasury (1995) Public Expenditure: Statistical Supplement to the Financial and Budget Report 1995–96, Cm. 2821, HMSO: London.

10.  Littlechild, S. (1979) ‘Controlling the Nationalised Industries: quis custodiet ipsos custodes?’ Series B Discussion Paper No. 56, University of Birmingham.

11.  Lindsay, C. M. (1976) A Theory of Government Enterprise Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84, p. 1061.

12.  Millward, R. and Parker, D. M. (1983) ‘Public and Private Enterprise: Comparative Behaviour and Relative Efficiency’ in Millward et al. Public Sector Economics Longman: London, pp. 199–274.

13.  Molyneux, R. and Thompson, D. (1987) ‘Nationalised Industry Performance: Still Third Rate?’Fiscal Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 48–82.

14.  Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1988a) Post Office Counters Services, Cm. 398 HMSO: London.

15.  National Economic Development Office (1976) A Study of UK Nationalised Industries, HMSO: London.

16.  Perelman, S. and Pestieau, P. (1989) ‘The Performance of Public Enterprises: A Comparative Efficiency Study of Railways and Postal Services’ in M. Neumann and K. W. Roskamp (eds) Public Finance and Performance of Enterprises, International Institute of Public Finance, Wayne State University Press: Detroit.

17.  Picot, A. and Kaulman, T. (1989) Comparative Performance of Government-Owned Countries, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vo. 145, No. 2, pp. 298-316.

18.  Primeaux, W. J. (1977) ‘An Assessment of “X” Efficiency Gained Through Competition’ Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 59, p. 105.

19.  Pryke, R. (1981) The Nationalised Industries: Policies and Performance Since 1968, Martin Robertson: Oxford.

20.  Shirley, M. (2000) ‘Why Performance Contracts for State-Owned Enterprises Haven't Worked’, OECD, Development Research Centre of the State Council of the PRC Asian Development Bank, Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises in China, Beijing, 18-19 January 2000.

21.  Shirley, M. and Walsh, P. (2000) Public versus Private Ownership: The Current State of the Debate, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2420, The World Bank Group.

22.  Shirley, M. and Xu, C. (2000) ‘Empirical Effects of Performance Contracts: Evidence from China’, OECD, Development Research centre of the State Council of the PRC Asian Development Bank, Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises in china, Beijing, 18-19 January 2000.

23.  Short, R. P. (1983) ‘The Role of Public Enterprises: An International Statistical Comparison’, Department Memorandum No. 83, International Monetary Fund: Washington DC.